Democracy and Pakistan

From 1947 to 1951, Pakistan as a fledgling nation did not run on the basis of a constitution. Government of India Act-1935 was the sole document that served the purpose of the constitution. After nine years the first legal constitution arrived in 1956. However the sanctity of this document proved short-lived. It was abrogated in 1958. This began the practice of accepting the intrusion of Armed Forces personnel in active politics in Pakistan. Iskander Mirza became the president with the support of General Muhammad Ayub Khan, Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces, who was named chief martial-law administrator. General Ayub Khan subsequently forced him to resign and became the president himself. When Zulfikar Ali Bhutto started the movement against Ayub Khan, there happened again a breach of faith in constitution. Ayub Khan resigned and transferred the power to Chief of Army- General Yahya Khan instead of following the rule of Constitution.This also shows that constitution of Pakistan has never earned the respect that a nation should owe to this ultimate endorsement of modern democratic philosophy. It was no wonder that Yahya Khan assumed the Presidency hereafter.  In 1973 the National Assembly adopted the country's fifth constitution. In 1977, the army Chief of Staff, General Muhammad Zia Ul-Haq, imposed another military regime. The Supreme Court of Pakistan sanctioned General Zia’s overthrowing of Bhutto government on grounds of necessity. This also set the precedence since now instead of being just a one time political event, the country accepted that whenever required, armed forces can become part of decision making process in the administration of the country overthrowing the legitimate avenues established in the constitution. When in later years, direct intervention of Armed Forces in governance was curbed in accordance with the constitution, General Karamat adopted an arm twisting tactic and resigned from the post of Army Chief. General Musharraf took over and imposed another decade of military regime in Pakistan. However he learnt fast from his predecessors. This time, he validated his dictatorship under the ruse of a referendum and got himself the Presidency through election-thus legitimizing his rule.

It can be thus concluded, that democracy in Pakistan has always been subservient to Army. It may be questioned that why do people allow the army personnel to interfere and later on usurp the power. The answer lies in the social makeup of the country and the state of economy.

In 1985 when election was held under General Zia tribal leaders were 157 in number in National Assembly. Businessmen accounted for 54 elected members. Industry was dominated by a few families and private ownership. Largely using their own resources, they accounted for the major part of investment and ownership in manufacturing during the first two decades after independence. Hence it is obvious that they would want someone in power to help further their individual profits. Whenever, anyone has tried to go against these handful of wealthy class of landlords and industrialists, they have ousted him. Case in point would be Mr. Bhutto’s administration. When Zulfikar ali Bhutto continued with his economic reforms, nationalization and limiting the power of Armed Forces, he incurred the wrath of these people which eventually led to his downfall.

 Sindhis and Punjabis have always dominated the political forefront in Pakistan. Whenever a political leader emerges in Pakistan his first campaign revolves around his ancestral home and biradari. Association and identification with a clan gives the popular endorsement to his views. In this, Pakistan is quite similar to Lebanon and other Middle Eastern nation states where national identity comes second to clan allegiance. This nature of politics is also a feature of any country where literacy level is low. According to UNESCO the education scenario in Pakistan is grim. Independent sources and educational experts place the overall literacy rate at 26 per cent and the rate for girls and women at 12 per cent. The situation is more alarming in rural areas. The significant spillover effect of such low literacy is reflected in political democracy of the country. A higher literacy rate would involve more people in the decision making process and would raise the economic status. Right now it is a vicious cycle of illiteracy, poverty, unemployment, lack of cohesion and national integrity. Corruption thus colludes the ideals and ambitions of people empowered to change the course of the country. At present growth rate stands at only 3.67. On the other hand, population growth rate is a staggering 34% between 2001 and 2011. Unless literacy and population control measures are adopted stringently, the economic benefits would be lost. Critics might say that this growth is due to the influx of refugees in the last decade. However the total fertility rate is highest in Pakistan- at 3.2 it is higher than India or Bangladesh.

So the challenges for the leading political parties in upcoming election are many- fighting corruption and terrorism, reviving the economy, establishing peaceful democracy and all its ministrations and increasing the literacy rate and standard of living.