About Me

My photo
India
love reading, listening to western classical music. teaching is my passion.I believe what Ayn Rand had said--"Well, have I taught you anything? I'll tell you: I've taught you a great deal and nothing. No one can teach you anything, not at the core, at the source of it. What you're doing--it's yours, not mine, I can only teach you to do it better. I can give you the means, but the aim--the aim's your own.." I believe in integrity- integrity of thoughts, ideas and ideals.

Sunday, January 20, 2013

Educationists who inspire me



Jiddu Krishnamurti was born on 11 May 1895 in Madanapalle, a small town in south India. He was  adopted in his youth by Dr Annie Besant, then president of the Theosophical Society. Dr Besant and others proclaimed that Krishnamurti was to be a world teacher. In 1929, however, Krishnamurti renounced the role that he was expected to play, dissolved the Order with its huge following, and returned all the money and property that had been donated for this work. From then, for nearly sixty years until his death on 17 February 1986, he travelled throughout the world talking to large audiences and to individuals about the need for a radical change in mankind.
Jiddu Krishnamurti’s ideals on education have been controversial, to say the least. Even now with our visions of liberal education, his ideas spark debates. Some say the ideas are impractical; some argue that they cannot be practiced in a world where a student has to succeed- and by success we obviously mean material gains, power and position.
Our views of education need to be realigned to understand Krishnamurti’s philosophy. In the present formal system of education, his ideas seem impractical. He talks about a complete harmony between an individual and the society. His views on society is similar to what was said in our Upanishads-
“Samaniba Akutih Samana Hrudayani chah;
Samanamastu Vo Manoah Yathavah Susahasti” 

“The purpose of all of you; let be one; let your hearts be one; let your minds be one, by means of which all of you could be one in all respects.” 
According to Krishnamurti, the purpose of education is to bring about freedom, the flowering of goodness, that in itself shall transform the society for better.
The freedom that he speaks of is, of course, spiritual rather than political. And he says that it is the duty of the schools to nurture this freedom among the children.
He insists that schools have special places for silence- where the students can know their thoughts- not just religious chanting of mantras and meditation. The silence he speaks of is a dialogue between the subconscious mind and the conscious mind.
Krishnamurti says in his diary-
“It’s(the brain) the centre of remembrance, the past; it’s the storehouse of experience and knowledge, tradition. So it’s limited, conditioned. Its activities are planned, thought out, reasoned, but it functions in limitation, in space-time. So it cannot formulate or understand that which the total, the whole, the complete is. The complete, the whole is the mind.”
This experience of life in its totality can be complete when one experiences the nature’s beauty- because there is no logical thought, nor purpose in its majesty. It is not by accident that the schools founded by him are away from the cities, in natural surroundings. Beauty to him brings about the sensitivity that he considers essential in human nature. The natural surrounding, the beauty of a tiny flower by the road speaks about the glory and majesty of harmony and selflessness.
“From this sensitivity for the whole of existence springs goodness, love;”Krishnamurti 1964)
Lastly, Krishnamurti speaks about the nature and duty of educators. They are central in his philosophy of education; in creating a space for the child to know himself, the teachers create that positive energy that drives the process of self-knowing and self- learning forward. And thus the society at large embraces the goodness and transforms itself for the better.
In 1901, someone in Bengal desired the same for children- freedom to express thoughts and follow the path to self-knowledge. In 1921 his ideals on education manifested in Vishva Bharati University. Rabindranath Tagore had similar views about freedom- like Krishnamurti he believed that nature is the ultimate teacher. Nearness to nature in all its resplendent would lead the students to freedom of heart; this then would manifest itself in his intellect and lastly it will evolve the free will so often spoken about by Rousseau.
There is another similarity between Krishnamurti and Tagore’s ideals on education. Both of them placed profound importance on art and creative pursuits for developing sensitivity in children. There is this famous story- It goes like this- Children at Patha bhavan  used to pick flowers from trees. In doing so they would often break the branches. So Gurudev told them that they were hurting the trees and advised them to take permission from the trees before plucking the flowers. Do you imagine that the children stopped? They kept on plucking the flowers-only from now on they peeped inside Tagore’s room and say that they had already taken permission from the trees.
At Patha Bhaban the children sat on hand-woven mats beneath the trees, which they were allowed to climb and run beneath, between the classes.
Amartya Sen, a Nobel Laureate himself and a former student of Patha Bhavan, writes that at Santiniketan, the emphasis was on “self-motivation rather than on discipline, and on fostering intellectual curiosity rather than competitive excellence.” 
The philosophy of education envisaged by both these educationists is more relevant today than it was before. We need the harmony of soul and nature, of hand and mind and of teacher and taught. We cannot just add these ideas into an otherwise mechanical system of schooling and advertise ourselves as “unique”. That would never work and as always we shall blame that the ideas were impractical to start with.
But if we take a pause from churning out  toppers rankers and IIT-ians and start paying attention to make the students lifelong learners, it would be these ideas that would show us the path to success and an enriched humanity.






Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Euro on Life Support

1999-Euro was introduced. December-2011, questions are already raised about continuing with this giant. Why it is a giant- Because Euro is the second largest reserve currency as well as the second most traded currency in the world after the United States dollar. The euro zone is the second largest economy in the world.
Following the US financial crisis in 2008, fears of a sovereign debt crisis developed in 2009. Greece, Portugal, Iceland became forerunners in the sovereign debt crisis that is spreading like a bonfire through the states of Euro zone.
A sovereign default is the failure or refusal of the government of a sovereign state to pay back its debt in full. It may be accompanied by a formal declaration of a government not to pay (repudiation) or only partially pay its debts. In layman’s term, the government can no longer hold its own economy together and washes its hands off from the economic crisis.  (See more in Wikipedia).
A dramatic rise in the interest rate faced by a government due to fear that it will fail to honor its debt is sometimes called a sovereign debt crisis. Governments may be especially vulnerable to a sovereign debt crisis when they rely on financing through short-term bonds. They may also be vulnerable to a sovereign debt crisis due to currency mismatch if they are unable to issue bonds in their own currency.
Governments may face severe pressure from lending countries. In the most extreme cases, a creditor nation may declare war on a debtor nation for failing to pay back debt, in order to enforce creditor's rights. This then promotes the basic tenet of economy- NOTHING IS FREE.
Now it is Italy’s turn to make sure the boat that it happily climbed on, now stays afloat.
The Italian Prime Minister has declared an Austerity package to ward off the evil.
Prime Minister Mario Monti unveiled a 30-billion-euro ($40.3 billion) package of austerity measures on Sunday, raising taxes and increasing the pension age in a drive to shore up Italy's strained finances and stave off a crisis that threatens to overwhelm the euro zone.
The measures followed growing pressure for sweeping measures to restore confidence in the euro zone's third-largest economy.
In a mark of the emotional impact of the cuts, Welfare Minister Elsa Fornero broke down in tears as she announced an end to inflation indexing on some pension bands, a move that will mean an effective income cut for many retired people. And it is not easy to stay rich in a rich country….
"… the next 10 days will decide whether the euro survives or not," Emma Marcegaglia, head of Italy's main business lobby Confindustria said before the package was announced
So, what does it spell in near future- More unemployment, less money, more loans, more debts and raising inflation. This would make things like food, medicine, clothes, education costlier. Already, IATA has announced that next year this zone will face greatest air traffic crisis if the situation is not fixed.
History shows that Goliath always goes down with a lot of noise- the question is have we already heard it or is it yet to come.. Italy is now the crusader for Euro. If the austerity measures work, Euro is saved for another 3-5 years. If it fails, Euro zone goes back to what it was before- Each one to their own.
I personally see the Euro zone as a chain of iron walls coming up behind which each country mends its flaws, develops itself in whatever way possible and then gets ready to meet the world again.
Gandhiji had long ago proposed “self realization” of our villages- each one wholly sufficient in itself. Should Europe learn that lesson or wait for its doomsday or is it too early for a paranoid “sky is falling” like me to announce its obituary… The fact remains that nobody can promise a bright future right now. The world economy as we know it at present may not remain the same in the coming years.

India-Are subsidies boon or a bane


India- Are subsidies boon or a bane?
In the last two weeks, there has been a lot of cry about the raise in oil prices. Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh has admitted that there is a growing fiscal deficit in the country and a slowing down of the economy.
The root cause behind this is the trend of Indian government announcing and maintaining numerous subsidies.
So much so, that a 2005 article by International Herald Tribune stated that subsidies amounted to 14% of GDP. On the other hand, according to the UNESCO, India has the lowest public expenditure on higher education per student in the world. Amount of emergency infrastructure investments is still much lower. We face the brunt of it- 90% of train accidents are due to poor track maintenance rather than negligence. Our airports run on primitive forecasting systems- hence, monitoring fogs and diverting air routes is still a distant dream. India pays lowest minimum on higher education per student. The result is that we have innumerable students with a Masters degree but with limited hands- on practical experience.
A report on Central Government Subsidies, released in 2004, maintains the following objectives behind allocating the subsidies-
- remove economic distortions, thereby improving economic efficiency and growth;
- achieve redistributive objective;
- reduce budgetary burden and release precious resources; and
- improve the environment by realigning the incentive structure to favour
environmentally sound practices.
Let us then see, how well these objectives have been met with.
Removing economic Distortions- In recent times, there is the paradox of mounting stocks of foodgrains and reported starvation deaths. Foodstocks reached a peak of 63 million tonnes. in July 2002, more than two-and-a-half times the norm of 24 million tonnes. By April 2004, the stocks were down to 20 milliontonnes, still higher than the norm of 16 million tonnes for April.
Large stocks of foodgrains raise the subsidy bill through increased handling and
carrying costs along with the losses. Besides, withdrawing such large quantities from the market also results in rising open market prices of foodgrains, neutralizing much of the consumer benefits that the subsidy provides. There are severe regional imbalances in the operation of the entire food subsidy scheme, as FCI’s purchase operations are mainly confined to five areas – Punjab, Haryana, Western Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh and now Chhattisgarh. The implication for the present policy of purchase is that farmers of only a few States get the entire farmers’ subsidy. A large percentage of these farmers are not even poor.
This scenario is related to the third objective as well- Improving the environment- Due to the over emphasis on rice and wheat in subsidy schemes, the regional and local crop diversification is at its minimum. Hence, even in a drought prone area like Telengana, instead of growing drought resisting crops, farmers are forcing themselves to grow these water- guzzling crops like cotton, wheat and rice. The result- In the ten year period between 1997 and 2006 as many as 166,304 farmers committed suicide in India. If we consider the 12 year period from 1995 to 2006 the figure is close to 200,000.
The rising farmer suicide rate has a direct link with social as well as economic factors in the region. Small and marginal farmers make up a chunk of the farmer population that has got no benefits from the government.

Now comes another major chunk in India’s budget allocation- Apart from food, fertilizer and petroleum subsidy, which are directly incurred and administered by the Central Government, there are numerous poverty alleviation schemes funded by the Centre but administered
through lower level governments. These are Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS). They are
not necessarily commodity-specific, but involve subsidized loans to vulnerable sections for specific purposes or projects benefiting the poor.
Four major programmes, namely Sampoorna Grameen Rozgar Yojana (SGRY), Swaranjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY), Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) and Rural Housing Scheme (RHS) account for 98 per cent of the budgetary allocation on the six CSS of the Ministry of Rural Development in the current financial year.
Majority of the backward States, where the CSS of Ministry of Rural Development are most needed,  have performed relatively poorly in terms of the three criteria. This includes Assam, Bihar, Jharkhand, and Uttar Pradesh.

I now present some statistics, according to UNICEF for “mera Bharat mahan:

1. Under 5 mortality rate in 2010 is 63/1000
2. Total literacy is 63%
3. % orf population using improved sanitation facilities- urban and rural stands at 54 and 21 respectively.
4. % of central government expenditure 2000-2009 allocated to health is a meager 2%.
5. % of central government expenditure 2000-2009 allocated to education  is only  3%.

India is ranked at 134 in Human Development Index. Vietnam, Iraq, Indonesia is placed at 132, 128 and 124 respectively.
The argument as given by the government is that it has to bear the burden of the social debt to subsidize the basic necessities and also spend more on social projects as no private sector would do anything in non profitable options. But the question remains that why, even after 52 years, such enormous subsidies would be required. In any country, there is always an effort by the government to honor the deadline set for such subsidies. They are supposed to be an incentive to becoming self-sufficient. In India, the ground reality is very different- here, subsidies spawn corrupt, decadent generation after generation whose objective remains same- to remain poor as it is more lucrative because this constitutes the “vote bank” that our politicians exploit in every election.  These subsidies should be targeted at the poor people and in improvement of village economy. But statistics prove otherwise. Agriculture and allied sectors like forestry, logging and fishing employed 60% of the total workforce in 2007, whereas they accounted for only 16.6% of the GDP (same year). The two most important areas of human development index- health and education- both suffers due to lack of fund.
The economic crisis escalated by such subsidies is- The projected fiscal deficit of 2009 has been put at 10.3% of our GDP. The consolidated debt-GDP ratio is estimated at 76.6 per cent in 2009-10 compared to 61.0 per cent in 1995-96 and 70.6 per cent in 2000-01. Remember Greece- if we follow that crisis, we should all be on red alert- most of all our “populist” government- “garibon ka sarkar.
It is high time that the administrators and policy makers accepted a paradigm shift in their policies. Frankly, 52 years of populist policies and vast gap between implementation and allocation of funds have, in fact, crippled India. Indian politicians and those in government now have a dual responsibility- one to its country and another to its international commitments. India has long been lobbying for entry into Security Council along with Brazil. However, both these countries have put impediments to global development. In 2007, a high-level meeting aimed at salvaging sputtering global trade talks collapsed on Thursday as the United States and the European Union fell out with India and Brazil over plans to slash agricultural subsidies and tariffs. The failure of the talks appears to have defeated the strategy of bringing together the United States, Europe, Brazil and India - a grouping known as the G-4 - to resolve major differences before turning to the entire membership of the WTO, which comprises 150 countries. Even though, I do not assume that U.S.A is a benevolent God distributing wellness for the world, I do believe that if you wish for leadership, then you have to set examples to follow. Sadly, in India, there is no longer any true leader – all are petty politicians looking after their own objectives. So the development of the country ends at slogans like “India rising”, “ Mera Bharat Mahan” etc.



Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Rain Water Harvesting

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Industry is more important than Agriculture

Industry became a key sector of production and labour in European and North American countries during the Industrial Revolution, which upset previous mercantile and feudal economies through many successive rapid advances in technology, such as the steel and coal production. It is aided by technological advances, and has continued to develop into new types and sectors to this day. Following the Industrial Revolution, perhaps a third of the world's economic output is derived from manufacturing industries—more than agriculture's share. However, the success of industries over agriculture has also been measured in terms of number of jobs created. Also, the societal changes in Western world is claimed to have  been generated from the development of industries and private companies becoming equal in wealth to the royalties.
However, we must also remember the side- effects of such prolific growth of industries-
The industrial revolution changed warfare, with mass-produced weaponry and supplies, machine-powered transportation, mobilization, the total war concept and weapons of mass destruction.
What had originally heralded the growth of industries ie. Creation of jobs is now on the decline due to ultra-modern machinery.
The third idea that modern goods will be produced by a country which when sold will earn foreign exchange has also got a hitch- some countries including India is flooded with cheap low-grade goods imported from China- thanks to policy decisions.
Fourth- The societal changes that were possible in Western world seems nowhere near in India , whatever be the industrial progress.
Fifth- progress of industries brought with it the irreversible damage to the natural and physical environment. After 200 years of mass scale degeneration of every natural resource on earth, countries are waking up to the sorry fact that without a sustainable environment, all their progress will go down the drain.
In India, 46 percent land is under cultivation, whereas less than 17 percent is industrial land. This gap between agriculture and industries may seem very high, but more than 70 percent Indian earn their livelihood on agriculture. To feed population of a billion, this percentage may even seem less.
Hence the big question is not whether one is important than the other- but how to create a balance between the development of both.
In recent years, this debate has become a front runner thanks to the Singur issue.
one way to strike a balance between the two would be to remove politics from the two sectors. There is a common proverb,
“Where there is life, there is politics, and
Where there is politics, there is corruption.
Instead of usurping paddy fields in the name of progress, state can direct the investors towards the lands which are not arable. In fact, I believe that at the dawn of Indian democracy, that remained the intention of builders of our nation.
There are several thousands of acres of barren land present in India. These land are either not suitable for agriculture or due to lack of resources, agriculture is not possible. Such areas can be found in western region of the country, which includes states like Gujarat and Rajasthan. Regions of black soil such as Deccan plateau and central India are less fertile than river plains and can be used for industries. Areas, which have very less food production, can also be utilized for industries like the Telenganas.
In conclusion it can be said that  for a nation’s development, both Industries and agriculture needs to progress. And that there is no debate to choose one over the other. The question to be answered is how to achieve maximum return from both without compromising the progress of individuals linked with the two sectors.

Monday, August 15, 2011

India Shining

Today we celebrate 65th Independence Day and hail India as she reaches newer heights of achievements.
The last decade has seen India taking on new challenges, leaping to new heights and aiming for more.
With a population of just over 1 billion, India is the world’s largest democracy. In the past decade, the country has witnessed accelerated economic growth, emerged as a global player with becoming the world’s fourth largest economy in purchasing power parity terms, and made progress on most of the Millennium Development Goals.
It is heartening to know that India did fairly well  in face of global economic melt-down .
However, it was also a decade  when India saw more terror strikes and unforgettable cruelties- Attack on Parliament, twice turning the city of Mumbai into a hell hole, and killing of  hundreds of innocent lives by our own citizens who have turned against us- the Maoists, ULFAs  and other extremists.It is this that we should be concerned about. Why would our own citizens turn so much of violence and hatred against their fellow citizens?
The answer lies in our indifference and lack of political will.
200,000 farmers have killed themselves during the past decade.  As early as in 1928, under the British rule, An Indian farmer was born in debt, lived in debt and left the burden of debt as inheritance to his next generation.
We hoped to see things being different under our own elected government. Unfortunately, today in 2011, an Indian farmer’s average debt remains at a staggering rs 13 thousand annually.
The number of people living below the poverty line is  260 Million  making India home to one-third of the world’s poor. This, even after 65 years of Independence.

If this  lopsided development continues, our nation stands the risk of being fragmented .
At this juncture, we should pause our mad rush of development and delve deeper into what Gandhiji had said. Because his economic ideas still hold relevance today.
Recent policies clearly shows that  large-scale industrialization destroys the fabric of human relationship since it is governed by mass production and benefits only a few.
We cannot have real peace in the world if we look at each other's countries as sources for raw materials or as markets for finished industrial goods. The seeds of war are sown with economic  greed. Our own history stands to this claim.
For Gandhi, the spirit and the soul of India rested in the village communities. He said, "The true India is to be found not in its few cities, but in its seven hundred thousand villages. If the villages perish, India will perish too."
So as we celebrate 65th   Independence Day, we should take a new pledge- that of making India and every one of its citizens empowered- in every respect. Let us also be proud of the glorious legacy left by our forefathers  and be determined to bring in a  brilliant future for all Indians, befitting the world’s largest democracy. Let us shed our indifference and lassitude towards the evils that plague our country and bring forth a truly powerful nation undivided in its ideals and people. Let the spirit of freedom reign supreme in our heart and soul. HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY.

Sunday, April 10, 2011

Irony of Indian Democracy

Finally, Anna Hazare wrings the hand of the most corrupt political party of India to draft a notification on anti-corruption Lokpal Bill. However, the burning question till remains- how fruitful will it be if the same corrupt and decadent ministers remain on the panel?
Mahatma Gandhi seeing the rampant corruption had asked for a decent burial of this party as early as in 1937... however, Indian illiterates went on worshiping the dynasty of Congress party- Nehru khandan.

Even after 67 years of independence, the people are so immune to corruption that they have learnt how to live with the system, rather than join hands to fight against it. I was watching the live coverage of Anna Hazare's hunger strike. People did come out in thousands to support the cause, but I wonder how many will be there to pass the bill and see it through as the Indian mentality has always been - "Raat gaye, baat gaye.."
Our first Prime Minister was party to a number of  corruptions, the most glaring of which was V.K.Krishna Menon involved in a corruption scandal. AND he was given a ministry without a portfolio in Nehru's cabinet. Then on, it has been a free ride on corruption and bribery for the Congress party. Ironically, not a single committee constituted for investigating cases against the heavyweight politicians of our country gives a conclusive report.  Even after 67 years of Independence, the people are so immune to corruption that they have learnt how to live with the system even though the cancerous growth of this malady may finally kill it.  The recent Tehelka episode surcharged the political atmosphere of the country but it hardly exposed anything, that was unknown to the people of this biggest democratic polity.    
Nehru's daughter, Indira, went a step further and institutionalized corruption in the party  by holding the post of Party President and Prime Minister..  The famous V.P.Malhotra (Chief Cashier of State Bank of India) case in which he got a telephone call believing from Indira Gandhi to pay Rs,60 lakhs to one Nagarwal remained a mystery.  Corruption cases like Fairfax, HBJ Pipeline, and HDW Submarine deal came up since then. 
Two of the Prime Ministers from this party bribed MP's to win trust vote.
At every level, Congress can be pointed at for bringing criminalization of politics in India. Every political party has its own cadre - goons, thugs and local smugglers. The nexus is such that even with right intentions administration can do nothing except to follow orders. The most recent case in point- Rahul Gandhi raping Sukanya Devi and getting away scotfree. The Prince of Congress, on 3rd December, 2006, raped this young girl from the constituency which had been the seat of gandhi power. he has been twice caught at International airport in USA with drug in possession. 
So, the bottomline is that whether we should rejoice at the seeming victory against corruption or be scared that another good-for-nothing committee will drain away our taxes further. Because, as I see it, the most corrupt political party run by the most corrupt family has nominated the members of the committee.